Loading...
Date of Incident
26/04/2025
Country
Scotland
Area
Route
Activity
Indoor climbing
When
Injury
No injury
Incident
An MCI was in charge of a group of four 16-18 year olds who were all experienced climbers and had been "signed off" as independent climbers at their local Climbing Wall. In the second half of a regular session at this wall, the climbers split into pairs to practice "lead climbing," which involves clipping in as the climber ascends. As there was a weight difference between XXX and his belayer (YYY), a secondary device called an Ohm had been fitted to the first bolt to add friction to the system and prevent the belayer being pulled off the ground. The belay device used was a Grigri 2. Both devices were confirmed as correctly fitted.
At the time of the accident, it was the lighter climber who was leading, but the Ohm had been intentionally left in place on the first bolt.
As XXX was attempting to clip the final top anchor point, he was starting to run out of strength. This was being filmed at the time by the MCI for coaching purposes. The MCI was not concerned by the prospect of a fall, as there was plenty of rope to absorb the fall, and there should have been no prospect of him reaching the ground. At this point, XXX did fall as anticipated but the fall was not stopped, and he struck the ground. Help was immediately given and XXX was told to lie still and an ambulance was called. In order to facilitate this, the MCI removed the rope from his harness. The knot was significantly difficult to untie, and evidence that the rope had been loaded and absorbed a lot of the energy of the fall. The paramedics could find no obvious signs of injury, but he was sent to A&E as is standard practice in these cases.
The doctor examining him at A&E could also find no signs of injury, but he was sent for an X-ray, which confirmed that there was no damage to any bones. The X-ray was also checked by the on-call Radiologist, and XXX was told no treatment (other than non-prescripton pain relief) was required and he was discharged later the same day.
It is the opinion of the MCI that the presence of the Ohm may have reduced the speed of the fall to below the threshold needed to initiate the assisted braking function of the Grigri. This should have been prevented by the correct belay technique of always keeping a firm grip on the "dead" rope. In conversation with the belayer, it seems he was holding the rope but did not grasp it firmly enough to prevent it from running through his hand.
The primary lesson at this stage is to constantly reiterate the need to keep a firm grip on the dead rope at all times, but advice will also be sought on how the introduction of the Ohm device might have affected the Grigri. Despite this, both devices introduced sufficient friction to slow down the descent sufficiently to prevent serious injury.
Lessons
As an instructor, unless you are physically holding the rope there is nothing you can do to prevent a fall in the event of belaying error.
Assisted braking does not mean automatically locking (and has never claimed to be).
Causes
Belaying failure or error
Anonymous?
Yes
Reported By
Instructor
Wearing Helmets?
Rescue Services Involved?
Ambulance
Author
25 June 2025 at 19:38:25
For more advice and guidance on good practices visit BMC skills
All reports are self-submitted and have not been edited by the BMC in any way, so please keep an open mind regarding the lessons and causes of each incident or near-miss.
If you have a concern regarding this report please contact us at incidentreports@thebmc.co.uk